Back to blog
Tax & Compliance

Transfer pricing & double taxation traps when running your own India back office

If your US/UK parent owns an Indian subsidiary, transfer-pricing and treaty rules quietly determine your effective tax rate. Here's where founders get burned.

May 5, 20259 min read

Setting up an Indian subsidiary feels like the "grown-up" choice. But the moment your US parent bills the Indian entity — or vice versa — you've entered transfer pricing territory, and a long list of compliance, tax and cash-flow traps that don't show up in the entity-setup brochures.

1. The arm's-length principle

Indian tax law (Section 92 of the Income Tax Act) requires every transaction between "associated enterprises" — your US parent and your Indian subsidiary — to be priced as if they were unrelated parties. Get it wrong and the Indian Tax Department can re-price the transaction, hit you with a 30%+ tax adjustment, and add penalties up to 200% of under-reported income.

2. The cost-plus markup question

Most India captives bill the parent on a cost-plus 10–18% markup for services rendered. The "right" markup depends on:

  • Function/risk profile (routine back-office vs. high-value R&D)
  • Comparable company benchmarks (CUP, TNMM, Cost-Plus methods)
  • Asset intensity and IP ownership

You'll need a Transfer Pricing Study (~₹1.5–4 lakhs/year), Form 3CEB filed annually, and Master File / CbCR if your group crosses revenue thresholds.

3. Double taxation risks (even with treaties)

India has a DTAA with the US, UK and most major economies — but it doesn't eliminate the risk:

  • Permanent Establishment (PE): If the Indian entity habitually concludes contracts for the US parent, the parent can be deemed to have a PE in India and taxed on attributable profits at 40%+.
  • Withholding tax: Royalties, technical services and management fees flowing out of India face 10–25% withholding, even when there's a treaty.
  • GAAR & SEP: General Anti-Avoidance Rules and Significant Economic Presence rules can override treaty positions.

4. GST input credit cash-flow trap

Your Indian entity collects 18% GST on services billed to the parent — and most of it is exported, qualifying for refund. But Indian GST refunds typically take 4–9 months to process, parking lakhs of working capital with the government. Plan your cash flow accordingly.

5. Repatriation friction

Pulling profits back to the parent is not simply "transfer the cash". You'll navigate:

  • Dividend distribution tax / withholding
  • RBI / FEMA approvals on capital movements
  • 15CA/15CB chartered-accountant certifications on every outward remittance

6. Why an EOR sidesteps most of this

When A+ Search employs your team via our Indian entity, there's no associated enterprise relationship between you and us — we're an arm's-length vendor. You pay our invoice, we pay the team. No transfer pricing study, no PE risk, no Form 3CEB, no 15CA/CB ritual on payroll, and GST is invoiced cleanly as export of services.

7. When the GCC math still wins

None of this means "never set up an entity". At 50+ employees, multi-year horizon, with strategic IP being created in India — owning the entity gives you control, brand and long-term tax planning levers worth the overhead. Just don't sign up for it on day one for 8 hires.

Stuck choosing? Talk to our team — 15+ years of India + USA operating experience, including running our own businesses across both jurisdictions.

Up next

True cost of hiring in India: PF, ESI, gratuity explained

Everything beyond gross CTC — Provident Fund, ESI, gratuity, insurance and admin overheads — and how to budget accurately for India hires.

Read next